<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: VMXNET3 vs E1000E and E1000 &#8211; part 1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rickardnobel.se/vmxnet3-vs-e1000e-and-e1000-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rickardnobel.se/vmxnet3-vs-e1000e-and-e1000-part-1/</link>
	<description>Specialists in IT infrastructure services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 17:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rickard Nobel		</title>
		<link>https://rickardnobel.se/vmxnet3-vs-e1000e-and-e1000-part-1/#comment-478567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rickard Nobel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 17:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rickardnobel.se/?p=2179#comment-478567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rickardnobel.se/vmxnet3-vs-e1000e-and-e1000-part-1/#comment-478552&quot;&gt;cees vos&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello Cees,
when using really legacy operating systems, I would suggest testing the &quot;VLANCE&quot; virtual network adapter. This NIC is the highest chance for legacy system to detect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rickardnobel.se/vmxnet3-vs-e1000e-and-e1000-part-1/#comment-478552">cees vos</a>.</p>
<p>Hello Cees,<br />
when using really legacy operating systems, I would suggest testing the &#8220;VLANCE&#8221; virtual network adapter. This NIC is the highest chance for legacy system to detect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: rickardnobel.se @ 2026-05-02 14:27:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->