<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: VMware HA and das.failuredetectiontime	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rickardnobel.se/vmware-ha-das-failuredetectiontime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rickardnobel.se/vmware-ha-das-failuredetectiontime/</link>
	<description>Specialists in IT infrastructure services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rickard Nobel		</title>
		<link>https://rickardnobel.se/vmware-ha-das-failuredetectiontime/#comment-394</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rickard Nobel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rickardnobel.se/?p=441#comment-394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Rhian and thank your for your comment. I see no problem with setting the same alternative isolation address on both clusters. As long as all hosts have network access to the device holding that IP then both HA clusters could use this as a second opinion to detect a network isolation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rhian and thank your for your comment. I see no problem with setting the same alternative isolation address on both clusters. As long as all hosts have network access to the device holding that IP then both HA clusters could use this as a second opinion to detect a network isolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: rickardnobel.se @ 2026-07-25 16:04:38 by W3 Total Cache
-->