<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Troubleshooting ESXi Jumbo Frames	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rickardnobel.se/troubleshoot-jumbo-frames-with-vmkping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rickardnobel.se/troubleshoot-jumbo-frames-with-vmkping/</link>
	<description>Specialists in IT infrastructure services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lijo George		</title>
		<link>https://rickardnobel.se/troubleshoot-jumbo-frames-with-vmkping/#comment-475079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lijo George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rickardnobel.se/?p=992#comment-475079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation. However, when I try payload size 8972 with vmkping, it fails, and when I try 8950 and any lower value, it works. Does that mean Jumbo frame is really in action in storage communication? I&#039;m ok to have frame sizes slightly lower than 8972, but want make sure it is not as low as 1518. Kindly advise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation. However, when I try payload size 8972 with vmkping, it fails, and when I try 8950 and any lower value, it works. Does that mean Jumbo frame is really in action in storage communication? I&#8217;m ok to have frame sizes slightly lower than 8972, but want make sure it is not as low as 1518. Kindly advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: rickardnobel.se @ 2026-09-06 06:04:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->