<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Actual throughput on Gigabit Ethernet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rickardnobel.se/actual-throughput-on-gigabit-ethernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rickardnobel.se/actual-throughput-on-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
	<description>Specialists in IT infrastructure services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 01:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Building the ultimate workstation with the Ryzen Threadripper - The Tong Family		</title>
		<link>https://rickardnobel.se/actual-throughput-on-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-473839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Building the ultimate workstation with the Ryzen Threadripper - The Tong Family]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 01:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rickardnobel.se/?p=526#comment-473839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] then you have two choices, go to a NAS over a 10Gb Ethernet (effective throughput will be of 1Gb Ethernet is 124MBps as an aside) and about 300-400MBps given the other [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] then you have two choices, go to a NAS over a 10Gb Ethernet (effective throughput will be of 1Gb Ethernet is 124MBps as an aside) and about 300-400MBps given the other [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: rickardnobel.se @ 2026-05-06 22:17:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->